Good news and bad news

Follow @JohnPlatinumG Good news

On the day that Barack Obama was re-elected to the White House here is an item of good news. A very reasonably-priced book has just been released on-line covering the case of Julian Assange in Sweden. The author is Guy Sims and it covers what really happened in Sweden. Most details have been quite widely available in Swedish for months but because the Zionist-owned media in England and America will not allow the publication of certain names connected with the case, including Anna Ardin, Sofia Wilen and Irmeli Krans it is a blessing to have the real facts in English at last. I bought a copy and read the first 50 pages enthralled by the absurdity of the accusations, the attempt by Anna Ardin to pervert the course of justice by removing pertinent tweets to how much she enjoyed the company of Julian Assange, and also the deletion of her paper on how to get revenge on men who dump a woman.

The reader learns that first Anna Ardin said she never had sex with Julian Assange. Then she said she did have consensual sex with Julian Assange. Then, several days later, having arranged a crayfish party in his honour, at which party she tweeted how cool it was (one of the tweets she deleted) she accused Assange of having raped her the night before the crayfish party she arranged for him. If she did not make this up herself she was convinced to accuse Assange by her friend Irmeli Krans and other officers at the police station. Irmeli Krans, a friend of Ms Ardin's for some two years prior to the women reporting Assange at the same police station at which Irmeli Krans worked at a time when Krans was on duty. Krans in fact interviewed Sofia Wilen and later made attempts to embellish or spice up the original statement, which Wilen would not sign. I covered some of this in an earlier post. I cannot understand why members of the Swedish prosecution and police service are not on trial for attempting to pervert the course of justice. But there are many things in this bad, bad world I have difficulty understanding, Nevertheless it is good new that this book is available in English and I urge you all to read it.

Bad news

It is with sadness that I have to report the death last Friday of Brian Spencer. Brian was one of the long-time campaigners for justice over the death of Dr David Kelly, the weapons' inspector over whose demise so many questions remain. I never met Brian but I am sure he was a good man. We have been in touch by Facebook and email for the last two years. His legacy is the most comprehensive blog on the minutiae of what happened to Dr Kelly, where the conflicts are, and where the conflicts of interest are. It contains numerous statements and is well worth not just a perusal but a study.

This is one of Brian's last comments on a Dr David Kelly website made on 28 September.

'The more complicated a cover up becomes and the more people get involved then the more likely mistakes will become apparent. This has happened with the Dr Kelly cover up.

Mr McGinty from the Attorney General's Office penned Annexes TVP 1-6 which are on the AG's website. He effectively derided the written and oral evidence of searcher Louise Holmes who stated that she went back to her car whilst fellow searcher Paul Chapman took DC Coe and his two companions in the direction of the wood where the body lay. McGinty's version was that the searchers met the three officers at the foot of Harrowdown Hill and that DC Shields and the unidentified third officer stayed behind with Louise Holmes.

Dr Richard Shepherd was commissioned to report on the pathological evidence and in a section about the alleged movement of the body wrote: 'The police officers (DCs Coe and Shields) who initially attended the scene commented that the body was "laying on his back", they did not describe sitting or slumping against a tree.'

So McGinty has Shields down at the bottom of the track and thus half a mile from the body. At the same time Shepherd has Shields with Coe attending the body. They can't both be right!'

 He further commented on comments to this post on Tuesday. Just over a month later he died, a campaigner to the end. Although he did not live to see justice in the Kelly case he fought for it. Others will continue with the struggle inspired by Brian's example.

The rape of Julian Assange

Follow @JohnPlatinumG

Last week, I thought I had turned up a breaking news article about Julian Assange which might clear his name. It was in the Swedish newspaper, Expressen, and claimed that one of the women accusing Assange of rape, Anna Ardin, was previously friends with the gay activist police interrogator, Irmeli Krans. This was some months before going with Sofia Wilen to the police station where Krans worked (not the one near to where these women reside) to make a complaint concerning Assange and condoms. Much to my chagrin the article turned out to have been published in March 2011 yet tomorrow the date will read 1 September 2012. Expressen, like other annoying newspapers, has the habit of superimposing the current date over old articles. There should be a law against this practice because it makes seekers after the truth look like idiots. At least it would do if anybody in this country had heard of this story. What is most disturbing about this story is that it has been around for almost eighteen months, and the UK media have totally ignored it. I had not heard about it or I would not have called it breaking news. You had not heard about it. But there is a lot more you have not heard.

There has been plenty of coverage of the name of Julian Assange, usually mentioned in the same sentence as the word ‘rape’, yet nothing of those who have made it their business to entrap him. Even my M.P. Steve McCabe tweeted how he thought Julian Assange should be extradited to Sweden to face rape charges. Why have the media made no mention of the other story, the one that could clear Assange? Yesterday I watched Sophia Smallstorm’s video questioning the official version of what really happened to the World Trade Centre on September 11, 2001. It finishes with the following:

"This film was made to present possibilities and raise questions. We do not control our airwaves. We have consigned them to large corporations who create scripted soundbites serving as news." 

And this is what we are getting regarding Julian Assange, a brave man who has had to seek refuge in the Ecuadorian Embassy to avoid extradition to the United States where he would be imprisoned indefinitely for leaking the shocking footage of US military personnel shooting innocent civilians and boasting about their conquests. It is true, we are getting scripted soundbites from the Zionist/Neocon media for nearly every news item published or broadcast today. This makes me ask if it is Julian Assange in need of rehabilitation, or is it the United States of America and its puppet the United Kingdom?

Let us look at the police statement taken by Irmeli Krans who now describes herself as a politician on Facebook. I suspect you did not know that much of this statement is available. I suspect you did not know that the original interrogation conducted by Irmeli Krans was in the public domain. This says more about who owns the media than the journalists themselves. They are not allowed to mention the names of Anna Ardin, Sofia Wilen or Irmeli Krans. Why not? Because if they did you might stumble across Sofia Wilen’s police statement  - which is quite graphic, and one which it might be added Sofia Wilen would not sign.

The interrogator, Anna Ardin’s friend, Irmeli Krans, has a politician’s way with making words say what is required at the time rather than making any serious attempt to tell the truth. The three belong to the same political party but Krans’ fabrication of the truth may be the reason why Sofia Wilen did not sign the original statement. Later it got even further embellished. There was an attempt to destroy the original statement but they found this was not possible. A week after Wilen's statement was taken Irmeli Krans made the following additions (in bold and underlined).

“When they went back in the bedroom Julian stood in front of Sofia and grabbed her hips and pushed her demonstratively down on the bed, as if he were a real man.”

“She lay awake a long time wondering what had happened and exchanged SMS messages with her friends. He lay beside her snoring.” 

“At one point when he mounted her from behind, she turned to look at him and smiled and he asked her why she was smiling, what she had to smile about. She didn't like the tone in his voice.”

I advise people to read the full statement to get the full context. Excuse me, but if Sofia is smiling while they are making love it does not seem like Julian Assange is raping her, or am I missing something? Wake up world. You are tools of the media!

Breaking News on Julian Assange

Follow @JohnPlatinumG I can’t see it being long now before Julian Assange is walking free. Today a Swedish newspaper, Expressen, has published an article which claims that Anna Ardin (though she is not mentioned by name) was friends with a police interrogator on the Assange case. Expressen was the newspaper that first broke the story of Assange’s arrest, so it can hardly be considered pro-Assange.

This is a big turning point in my opinion. Especially since the two women who went to the police station together, appear to have gone at the beginning of this interrogator’s shift. You can almost smell the sweet aromas of a woman to woman phone call before the Anna and Sofia arrived at the police station to be interviewed by a friend of one of them. Only somebody with a passing interest in this case, someone who has been catching all the endless snippets of the words ‘rape’ and ‘Assange’ in the same sentence, can be naive enough to believe there is any credibility to this concocted sex scandal. They are all in the same Social Democratic Party, and this brings us to what chance of a fair trial would Assange have in Sweden? I quote from one of the best accounts of the Assange case regarding secret trials in Sweden.

 “Even in this relatively enlightened country, human sexuality is a subject fraught with deep and often subconscious feelings of guilt and shame. “Prosecution witnesses need not worry about other witnesses coming forward to refute their evidence, because their evidence will not be heard in public.” Most of those stories involve the treatment of men accused of sex crimes. It is one of the dark corners of Swedish society that seldom sees the light — most likely because, even in this relatively enlightened country, human sexuality is a subject fraught with deep and often subconscious feelings of guilt and shame.

 But jurists and other interested parties with direct experience of sex-related cases have become increasingly alarmed by what appears to be a systematic bias that often leads to bizarre and tragic judgements. There are several reasons for this, one being that trials for sex crimes are almost invariably held behind closed doors. “This tradition grew up a long time ago, before the [Second World] war, to prevent the press reporting ‘immoral’ evidence, and was later advanced to protect the privacy of complainants and defendants,” notes one of Assange’s Swedish lawyers, who further explains that his client, “… notwithstanding the avalanche of publicity damaging to him about the prosecution case, will be tried in secret and the public will not be aware of any exposure in the courtroom of the weakness of that case.

Prosecution witnesses need not worry about other witnesses coming forward to refute their evidence, because their evidence will not be heard in public.” Further, “The trial will be heard by a judge and three laypersons who sit with him or her. The three laypersons, appointed by political parties, are often members of the parties that appoint them.… I should add that the danger caused by media prejudice is also present at the court of appeal level, where the hearings will again be in secret.”

 Last night Newsnight presenter Gavin Esler and Independent on Sunday columnist Joan Smith almost jumped down Craig Murray’s throat for mentioning Anna Ardin, one of the two women who sought to expose Julian Assange as a sexual deviant. But the truth is her name, and that of her co-conspirator, Sofia Wilén, have been in the public domain for two years. What the media do not want is people searching the internet to find out the truth. The truth is becoming something alien to the media. That is why they want to gag Julian Assange. It is why they want to gag Craig Murray. Ironically it is two years today since Assange was set free on the same charges of which they say he needs to answer questions now.